<< Previous
1 of 2
<< Previous
1 of 2


WITH STRANGE-LOOKING instruments that catch radio waves from the stars, Australian scientists are probing the mysteries of the universe. So far they have identified 100 “radio stars”—highly localized sources of cosmic static.

Several of the instruments are used to study the radio waves that originate on the sun’s surface. A “quiet” sun emits a constant radio signal indicative of its temperature. But when great columns of fire shoot from its surface, the radio waves change and the earth experiences radio fadeouts and magnetic storms.

Near Sydney, three separate rhombic aerials rotate to follow the sun from sunrise to sunset. They are connected to radio receivers that tune rapidly from 40 to 240 megacycles each second, and record when and on what wavelength any of these transitory disturbances occur.

Another installation consists of 48 parabolic “dish” antennas arranged in two rows at right angles to each other. Operating in a very narrow range, the system can pinpoint any existing active radio areas on the sun.

The distribution of neutral hydrogen in space is investigated with a small radio telescope that has a bowl antenna 36 feet in diameter. Hydrogen gas is audible on its receiver as a steady humming note.

A larger radio telescope in use is 80 feet in diameter and is mounted in a bowl hollowed out of the ground on a cliff near the entrance to Sydney Harbor.

Australia’s biggest radio telescope, however, is the “Southern Cross,” named for its shape. Each of the 1500-foot arms of the cross contains hundreds of receiving elements which pick up the minute static of far-distant radio stars.

Eventually this equipment will be augmented by a giant saucer-shaped aerial 250 feet in diameter that will rotate between two towers 200 feet from the ground. This will allow the telescope to scan any section of sky. * * *

  1. Hirudinea says: January 4, 20134:13 pm

    Kang: “…we receive over one million channels from the furthest reaches of the galaxy.”
    Bart: “You get HBO?”
    Kang: “No. That would cost extra.”

    Treehouse of Horror. (Thank you.)

  2. wyogold says: January 7, 20131:27 pm

    So when did people start saying “antenna” instead of “aerial”?

  3. Toronto says: January 7, 20139:30 pm

    I heard that American radios had antennae and British wireless sets had aerials.

    But my Canadian family usually used “aerial” for monopoles such as on a portable am/fm set, vs a stretched wire antenna or a set-back coil.

Submit comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.